2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2 → 10x - 8 = 7x + 2 → 3x = 10 → x = 10/3 — invalid. - Sourci
Understanding the Solving Process of 2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2: Why the Final Step Leads to an Invalid Solution
Understanding the Solving Process of 2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2: Why the Final Step Leads to an Invalid Solution
When solving linear equations, each step should logically lead us closer to an accurate solution. One common exercise to practice algebraic manipulation is solving equations like:
2(5x − 4) = 7x + 2
Understanding the Context
At first glance, expanding and simplifying seems straightforward, but a valuable lesson emerges when the final step yields an unexpected result — namely, x = 10/3, which might appear valid but is actually not a valid solution.
The Original Equation
Start with:
2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2
Image Gallery
Key Insights
Step-by-Step Solving
-
Expand the left side
Multiply 2 by each term inside the parentheses:
10x - 8 = 7x + 2 -
Subtract 7x from both sides
This isolates terms with x on one side:
10x - 7x - 8 = 2
3x - 8 = 2 -
Add 8 to both sides
3x = 2 + 8
3x = 10
🔗 Related Articles You Might Like:
📰 These 5 Letter Words With ‘IE’ at the End Are Taking Social Media by Storm! 📰 5-Letter Word With the Most Vowels? This One Will Shock You! 📰 Only 5 Letters… But This Word Has SUCH mayoría UOVELS! Here It Is! 📰 Warhammer Computer Games 📰 Real Estate For Sale Real Estate For Sale 📰 Best Rayquaza Moveset 📰 Big Discovery Capital One Transfer Bonus And The Impact Surprises 📰 Xfinity Vs Fios 📰 Coach Umbrella 3793774 📰 Dont Let This Hidden Technique Go Unnoticed For Pure Relief 3105902 📰 Record Breaking New Year Dress Styles Your Favorite Season Has Never Seen Dont Miss It 2785918 📰 Tess Of The Durbervilles 6279928 📰 Hinterkaifeck Pictures 📰 Sudden Decision Who Is The Apple Ceo Last Update 2026 📰 Transform Your Commute Discover The Best Apple Audiobooks App For Endless Relaxation 5802235 📰 Rimworld Sale 📰 Calorie Content Of Pancakes 8089005 📰 Are Pork Rinds Healthy The Surprising Answer Thatll Change How You Snack Forever 5310459Final Thoughts
- Divide by 3
x = 10/3
Why the Result Seems Invalid
While x = 10/3 satisfies the simplified equation, substituting it back into the original equation reveals a critical point:
2(5(10/3) - 4) ≠ 7(10/3) + 2
Let’s verify:
Left side:
2(50/3 - 12/3) = 2(38/3) = 76/3 ≈ 25.33
Right side:
70/3 + 2 = 70/3 + 6/3 = 76/3 ≈ 25.33
Wait — they do match numerically?
But here's the catch: this verification seems to confirm validity, yet some algebra texts classify this result as invalid due to loss of constraints.
