7Dr. Emily Carter identified fossil spores in three sediment layers: upper (18 samples), middle (42), lower (60). She wants to organize them into display cases such that each case has the same number of samples from each layer, with no samples left. What is the maximum number of display cases she can use? - Sourci
7Dr. Emily Carter’s Discovery: Maximizing Display Cases with Equal Fossil Spore Samples from All Sediment Layers
7Dr. Emily Carter’s Discovery: Maximizing Display Cases with Equal Fossil Spore Samples from All Sediment Layers
In a groundbreaking study, paleontologist Dr. Emily Carter identified fossil spores in three distinct sediment layers from a key geological site: 18 samples from the upper layer, 42 from the middle layer, and 60 from the lower layer. These samples offer invaluable clues about ancient ecosystems and environmental changes across time. Now, Dr. Carter seeks to create equal, informative display cases for public engagement and research — each containing the same number of fossil spores from every sediment layer, with no samples left over. The challenge: what is the maximum number of display cases she can construct under these conditions?
Understanding the Context
Understanding the Problem
To ensure each display case has identical representation from all three layers, the number of samples from each layer per case must evenly divide the total counts: 18 upper, 42 middle, and 60 lower fossils. Thus, the critical question becomes: What is the largest number of cases such that each layer’s samples are fully and equally distributed?
This requires finding the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the three sample counts: 18, 42, and 60.
Image Gallery
Key Insights
Finding the Greatest Common Divisor (GCD)
We compute the GCD to determine the maximum number of display cases possible with no leftover samples:
- Prime factorization:
- 18 = 2 × 3²
- 42 = 2 × 3 × 7
- 60 = 2² × 3 × 5
- 18 = 2 × 3²
The common prime factors are 2 and 3, each to the lowest power present:
- Minimum power of 2 = ²¹ → 2¹
- Minimum power of 3 = ³¹ → 3¹
Thus:
GCD(18, 42, 60) = 2 × 3 = 6
🔗 Related Articles You Might Like:
📰 Shocking Truth: The Most Undervalued Stocks Youre Missing Out On Are Rising Fast! 📰 Dont Miss These Outperforming Undervalued Stocks—Experts Say Theyre Underrated! 📰 Motocyclegames Unleashed! Experience the Hottest Racing Action You Wont Want to Miss! 📰 Sun Microsystems 📰 Public Reaction 2Fa Authenticator And The Situation Turns Serious 📰 Next 2 Years Decline At 15 Per Year 7798749 📰 Why Didnt Caitlin Clark Play 4837535 📰 Aneurysm 4 Game 📰 Marcel Duchamp Fountain 📰 Car Racing Game Online 📰 Ricochet The Game 📰 Your Perfect Wallpaper Will Turn Ordinary Walls Into Stunning Love Vibescoquette Wallpaper That Whispers Desires And Ignites Fantasies 3857140 📰 How Much Does A Pediatrician Make 9102414 📰 Question What Is The Remainder When 1001 1003 1005 1007 1009 Is Divided By 11 6665501 📰 Red Lobster Crabfest Menu Prices 6206360 📰 Medium Info 6676348 📰 All Characters In The Simpsons 📰 Real Ways To Make Money From Home 9629736Final Thoughts
Organizing the Display Cases
Dr. Carter can therefore prepare 6 display cases — the maximum number possible — each containing:
- 18 ÷ 6 = 3 fossil spore samples from the upper layer
- 42 ÷ 6 = 7 fossil spore samples from the middle layer
- 60 ÷ 6 = 10 fossil spore samples from the lower layer
This balanced arrangement ensures each case is rich, consistent, and scientifically meaningful.
Why This Matters
By aligning her display strategy with mathematical precision, Dr. Carter not only honors scientific rigor but also enhances educational storytelling. Using the GCD to balance sample distribution ensures that each case delivers equal scientific value — a hallmark of thoughtful curation in paleontology.
Conclusion
The maximum number of display cases Dr. Emily Carter can create — with uniform, non-empty representation of fossil spores from all three sediment layers — is 6. This achievement reflects both scientific ingenuity and practical display planning, setting a powerful example for interdisciplinary research communication.
