Wait — perhaps 720 is a misprint and should be 24? But 24 makes sense.

Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:29:17 +0000

Wait—720? Not Quite—Why Set Your Timer at 24 Instead? When you’re tuning into media, forecasting playlists, or syncing devices, the number 720Hz often sounds impressive—but could “24” be the more sensible and practical standard? While 720Hz has dominated high-refresh-rate discussions, a closer look suggests that 24 frames per second (fps) remains a powerful baseline, especially for time-sensitive applications. But why is that? Let’s unpack why setting your display or media player to 24, not 720, might make far more sense. ### Why 720Hz Sounds Great, But Is It Practical?
720Hz refresh rates—the pinnacle of visual smoothness—offer staggering fluidity, reducing motion blur and enhancing detail in fast-paced content. That sounds ideal for gaming, professional video, and virtual reality. However, 720Hz demands extreme hardware, costly displays, and overwhelming processing power—features still limited to niche markets. For most users and devices, 720Hz delivers diminishing returns due to human visual perception thresholds, while increasing costs and complexity unnecessarily. ### Why 24fps Strikes a Smarter Balance
The classic 24 frames per second, rooted in cinematic tradition, strikes a perfect balance between smoothness and realism. It feels natural to the human eye, avoids motion artifacts, and works seamlessly across devices—from smartphones to streaming apps—without straining hardware. For 24fps, time is experienced clearly and comfortably, aligning with how we perceive motion in everyday life and video content.